In another case, Edelman was accused of bribing bloggers to write favorable reviews of Microsoft's new Vista operating system after it sent a group of top bloggers top-of-the-range Acer Ferrari notebook computers, pre-loaded with Windows Vista.
In both these cases bloggers were quick to condemn the companies, in the first case the blog was removed. In the latter, following the bribery allegations, Microsoft encouraged the bloggers to donate the laptops to charities after they had tried and reviewed Vista.
Another tactic being used by companies today is - pay-per-post blogs. Bloggers are offered cash to write about products. Disclosure is optional, and often the bloggers are required to only express positive comments.
Is there anything wrong with flogs?
I don’t believe there is. Is there any difference between a company creating a ‘flog’ and sending out a press release or paying for an advertorial? There have been calls recently to regulate blogs; despite not being practical this is also is a form of censorship.
However there is an ethical debate surrounding this subject that should make PR practitioners think twice before recommending such a tactic to a client. If PR wants to establish its self as a profession, it needs to establish a code of conduct that by nature advocates honesty and transparency. A flog is not ethical, practitioners need to decide what is more important –establishing a profession or acting to promote a company at whatever cost.
One of the differences between bloggers and journalists is the fact that the first is not usually paid to write stories, as declared by Stephen Davies, Online Communications Specialist, in an interview on "PR under sign of Technology" blog: http://prundersignoftechnology.blogspot.com/2010/03/dealing-with-bloggers.html
ReplyDeleteWith this in mind I can only say a blogger on a pay-per-post blog is not a blogger:)
In my opinion, the problem with paying bloggers is that one cannot tell which posts are being paid for. In contrast, in case of advertorials, readers know the article is paid promotion (in Romania we use a "P sign").
I agree with you a pay-per-post blog is not technically a blog, but as you highlighted there is no way to tell if a bloger has been paid or not. Currently there is also no requirement for bloggers to disclose any payments. In my opinion this misleads readers and opens up an ethical debate. Maybe in future it should be mandatory for bloggers to identify if they have accepted payment for their post, similar to the disclosure required for advertorials. it could be called a blogatorial!
ReplyDelete